The start of 2026 marks a significant surge in hiring, but it also introduces a new wave of stringent Clean Slate laws and compliance updates. If your background screening policy hasn’t changed in the last twelve months, you’re likely working with an outdated (and often inefficient) playbook.
Efficiency is the top priority for HR teams this year, yet many are still clinging to outdated habits that slow down time to hire and increase risk. A standard background check in 2024 doesn't hold up against today’s regulatory landscape.
As HR teams set goals for faster, smarter hiring, it’s the perfect time to review what not to carry forward. We’ve rounded up seven common background screening mistakes you should leave behind to ensure your hiring is faster, fairer, and fully compliant this year.
The Problem: Not every role carries the same level of risk. Applying the same background check to all positions can lead to over-screening, higher costs, and compliance concerns — or worse, under-screening for sensitive roles. For example, A Chief Financial Officer requires a deep dive into credit and professional credentials, while a driver needs continuous Motor Vehicle Record (MVR) Monitoring.
Resolution for HR: Align your screening packages with job duties, industry regulations, and risk exposure to balance your budget and security. Utilize Verified First’s Employment Screening Calculator to view relevant screens based on industry and role requirements.
The Problem: Clean Slate laws, expungement rules, and reporting limitations continue to expand at the state and local level. Relying on outdated policies can lead to non-compliance even when checks are run correctly. If you run a check too early in a "Ban the Box" city, or use an automatically sealed record from a "Clean Slate" state, you risk significant legal exposure.
Resolution for HR: Regularly review relevant state and local regulations and ensure your screening criteria reflect current law and partner with an accredited PBSA provider.
The Problem: Rejecting a candidate based on a report without following the two-step Adverse Action notice process. Improper adverse action (i.e., missed notices, rushed timelines, or poor documentation) is one of the most common sources of Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) violations.
Resolution for HR: Follow a consistent, compliant adverse action process and ensure your team’s training is up to date. Look for screening providers who help automate this process.
The Problem: Employers are ultimately responsible for compliance, even when using third-party screening providers. Allowing a vendor contract to auto-renew for years without checking their accuracy or speed can silently derail your hiring process. For example, if your vendor still requires you to manually upload PDF consent forms instead of using a mobile-friendly link for candidates, you're likely adding days of unnecessary friction to your onboarding process.
Resolution for HR: Conduct regular vendor audits to review accuracy, turnaround times, data security, and compliance support.
The Problem: Risk doesn’t stop after onboarding. An employee’s status can change on Day Two or Year 5. For roles involving driving, healthcare, or financial access, a check from three years ago is effectively useless (and non-compliant) today.
Resolution for HR: Adopt a policy to rescreen all employees at least annually. It is also best practice to implement rescreening policies for promotions, role changes, and reviews where legally appropriate. Consider incorporating a process like Batch Rescreening to simplify employee rescreening.
The Problem: When background checks are treated as purely administrative, they fail to support broader hiring, compliance, and risk-management goals. When screening is just a task, teams rush it, ignore red flags, or choose the cheapest possible provider. This can lead to negligent hiring claims, significant fines, and reputational damage.
Resolution for HR: Integrate background screening into workforce planning, compliance strategy, and onboarding processes. Consider background screening as a strategic risk management tool.
The Problem: Operating an inefficient workflow that forces your HR team to manually enter candidate data into multiple platforms and portals. Manual entry leads to typos (which cause incorrect reports), delays, and candidate drop-off. In 2026, efficiency is everything. If your team has to log in to three different platforms just to hire one person, your time to hire is suffering.
Resolution for HR: Partner with a background screening provider that offers an efficient integration with your chosen HR technology. This allows your team to initiate checks and view results within the platform they already know and love, keeping the entire hiring process in one seamless workflow.
Verified First’s 2026 HR Tech Report: Addressing Risk, Speed, & Strategy synthesizes over 1,000 buyer selections to deliver a clear directive: Success is achieved by those who integrate risk management and ROI as core pillars of their strategy. Learn why the market is prioritizing risk and speed, top technology replacement trends, and more in the report!
Download your copy, here!
Stop tolerating “good enough” screening and hiring processes. As 2026 brings new regulations and higher expectations for speed, the screening habits that worked in the past could be the very things holding your team back today.
Modernizing your background screening doesn’t have to be an overhaul. Often, it’s about choosing the right tools and a partner that understands the shifting landscape. Whether it’s integrating your ATS to save your team hours of manual work or staying ahead of the latest Clean Slate updates, small changes now will pay off in reduced risk and better hires all year long.
Verified First can help you audit your current workflow and show you how a seamless, integrated approach can transform your hiring experience.
We are proud members of the Professional Background Screening Association (PBSA)
Verified First is NIST 800-53 compliant.
© 2025 Verified First, LLC | Privacy Policy | Legal
