Compliance Guide: Navigating Clean Slate, Expungement, and Ban the Box Laws in 2026

For HR leaders operating in multiple states, the question is no longer if you need to review your criminal background screening policy, but how quickly you can update it. 2026 is shaping up to be a critical compliance checkpoint, with new Ban the Box, Clean Slate, and Fair Chance Hiring legislation popping up every day. In fact, 37 states and over 150 local jurisdictions have already adopted some form of Fair Chance law, and 14 states are actively automating record sealing through Clean Slate legislation.

Navigating these compliance complexities requires a proactive strategy. To safeguard your organization and unlock new talent pools, you must precisely understand the three forces converging on your hiring process:

• Ban the Box: This movement regulates the timing of your inquiry, prohibiting questions regarding criminal history until after the initial job application. The goal is to have employers assess a candidate's qualifications first.
• Expungement/Sealing: The traditional, petition-driven process where an individual successfully asks a court to remove or hide their criminal record from public view.
• Clean Slate: Clean Slate mandates the automatic sealing or expungement of specific low-level or aged records by the state itself, requiring zero action from the individual. 

The Bottom Line: Your screening policy cannot afford to wait. This guide provides a proactive roadmap to navigate new legislation, master Fair Chance hiring, and fortify your policies against increased litigation risk in 2026. 

Disclaimer: The information in this article is not intended to be legal advice. It is always best practice to consult your legal counsel for your organization’s specific requirements. 

The Clean Slate Revolution: What HR Needs to Know

Criminal record screening is undergoing a fundamental transformation. For years, the background check was a relatively stable report of an applicant's history. With the rise of Clean Slate laws, that report has become a dynamic, jurisdiction-specific snapshot of legally reportable history.

The greatest risk for HR professionals in 2026 is relying on the assumption that "no news is good news," or the disconnect between new expungement/sealing legislation and outdated internal policies. If you fail to update your hiring process, you risk litigation under both Ban the Box laws and the Fair Credit Report Act (FCRA).

What "Automatic" Clearance Means for Your Hiring Data

The core change HR professionals should know is this: Clean Slate replaces the old, slow process in which individuals file complex, costly paperwork to get a record sealed, with an automatic system managed by the state's courts. 

What does this mean for your organization?

• Fewer Reportable Records: Your policy must acknowledge that records previously visible will not be reportable, and you must rely only on what is legally reportable.
• Applicant's Legal Answer: Once a record is sealed or expunged, the applicant can legally answer "No" to questions about that conviction. Asking about sealed records is a compliance violation.

Key Clean Slate and Ban the Box Deadlines for 2026

New legislation demands your attention now. Major states are activating Clean Slate automatic sealing and stricter Ban the Box legislation in 2026: 

• D.C.'s Second Chance Act: Automatic expungement begins January 2026. This includes sealing for decriminalized offenses and misdemeanors after a period of time.
• Philadelphia Ban the Box: Amendments reducing misdemeanor look-back to 4 years and banning summary offenses are effective January 6, 2026.
• Virginia’s Clean Slate: Implementation begins July 2026. This update will automatically seal certain misdemeanor and non-violent felony records after set waiting periods.
• Washington State: Stricter Ban the Box rules (post-offer check timing, mandatory individualized assessment) take effect July 1, 2026, for medium and large employers.

Compliant Background Check vs. Outdated Policy

The most critical distinction in this Clean Slate era is recognizing that your own internal policy is the liability risk, not necessarily the data provided by your background check partner. Certified, compliant background check solutions should report only on records that are legally disclosable under the FCRA and state law, plus filter out documents that have been sealed or expunged. 

You risk litigation when your internal policy does the following:

• Relies on Blanket Disqualifications: Your policy may still mandate rejecting applicants for "any felony in the last seven years," even if the conviction is now legally deemed irrelevant by the state.
• Fails Individualized Assessment: You fail to weigh the nature of the crime against the duties of the job, which is a requirement under Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance and Ban the Box laws.
• Inquires too Early: Your hiring process may inadvertently ask applicants about records that are now legally protected or sealed, especially in jurisdictions like Washington, where the timing is strictly post-offer.

State by State Compliance Map: Ban the Box, Clean Slate, and Fair Chance Laws

The complexity of Fair Chance laws lies in their fragmentation. A national employer must track three types of risk: Data Risk (Clean Slate), Process Risk (Ban the Box Timing), and Scope Risk (Lookback Limits). 

The reality is that over 75% of the U.S. population lives in an area with some form of Ban the Box or Clean Slate legislation. This comprehensive matrix covers essential existing laws and critical 2026 deadlines.

The Fair Chance Process: Individualized Assessment is Key

The jurisdictional compliance map above indicates when you can conduct a background check, but the EEOC and state Fair Chance laws govern what you must do with the results.

If a candidate's background check returns a legally reportable conviction, your team cannot default to a blanket denial. The single most important step in mitigating legal risk (and your primary defense against claims of discriminatory hiring) is the Individualized Assessment.

The EEOC's Three Critical Factors

The EEOC guidance requires employers to consider three factors, the Nature-Time-Job test, when determining if a conviction is relevant enough to warrant denial:

• Nature and Gravity of the Offense: How severe was the crime? Is it a misdemeanor or a felony, and how does the conviction relate to the core mission of your business?
• Time Elapsed / Completion of Sentence: How recent was the offense? Many cities (such as Philadelphia, post-January 2026) are tightening this rule, mandating you ignore convictions older than four or seven years.
• Nature of the Job Held or Sought: Does the conviction have a direct and functional relationship to the specific duties and risks of the role? (e.g., A prior felony theft conviction is highly relevant for a bank teller role but not for a remote software engineer.)

The Adverse Action Process

In many Ban the Box jurisdictions (e.g., California, New York City, Washington State), the Individualized Assessment is a mandatory precursor to the Adverse Action process. This multi-step process is crucial for mitigating liability:

• Step 1: The Pre-Adverse Action Notice: After the assessment confirms the conviction is job-related, you must notify the candidate in writing that you are tentatively denying employment. The pre-adverse action notice must include a copy of the background report and specific legal language outlining the candidate's rights and responsibilities.
• Step 2: The Review Window: The candidate must be given a specific period (usually 3 to 5 business days, depending on the state) to review the findings and submit evidence of rehabilitation, error, or expungement. You must prove you waited.
• Step 3: Final Adverse Action Notice: Only after the review window has expired and you have considered any mitigating evidence can you issue the final denial, again using the state's required notice language.

3 Steps to Prepare for 2026 Legislation

Compliance is not just about what appears on a background check. Proactive compliance refers to how your internal systems and policies handle that information. Use this checklist now to audit your hiring lifecycle and eliminate the liabilities posed by the 2026 deadlines.

1. Audit and Update Your Hiring Workflow

• Remove the Box: Verify that criminal history questions have been removed from all job applications (both digital and paper) nationwide.
• Establish a Compliant Timeline: Determine the compliant point in your hiring process (typically after the conditional offer) to initiate the background check. 
• Train Recruiters and Hiring Managers: Ensure all hiring personnel understand the exact legal timing of criminal history discussions. Training should cover specific state rules, such as those in New York City, which limit who can ask and when.

2. Refine Your Disqualification Matrix

• Eliminate Blanket Bans: Remove generalized language such as "any felony conviction in the last 7 years." This is the primary driver of disparate impact claims.
• Adjust Lookback Periods: Align your matrix with the most restrictive local laws. For instance, Philadelphia's January 2026 reduction of misdemeanor lookback to four years should serve as your standard unless there is a specific safety mandate.
• Formalize Individualized Assessment: Ensure your policy requires a written assessment before the issuance of the pre-adverse action notice. This is your primary defense against litigation in jurisdictions like California and New York.

3. Fortify Your Adverse Action and Data Integrity

• Mandate Accurate Data Policy: Update your policy to mandate that you will only consider legally reportable information. Your policy must be explicitly protected against using outdated data that Clean Slate laws have rendered non-disclosable.
• Standardize State-Specific Notices: Avoid relying on generic notices. You must use the correct state and local versions of pre-adverse and final adverse action notices, which often include specific summary-of-rights forms unique to jurisdictions like California.
• Mandate the Review Window: Enforce the required 3 to 5 business day review window before sending a final denial. No exceptions. 

Turning Complexity into Competitive Advantage

The shift toward Fair Chance hiring is more than a temporary trend. By proactively auditing your policies, you move beyond risk avoidance to embrace a defensible, consistent, and inclusive hiring program. 

However, executing this strategy successfully requires more than just updated paperwork — it requires technology built for modern, multi-state compliance. This is where a dedicated partner becomes indispensable. Verified First is your essential resource for the 2026 shift, built to solve the three most critical compliance risks detailed in this guide: 

• Data Control & Visibility: Leverage our platform's flexibility to access your background check data instantly and integrate with your existing HR system. This empowers your compliance team to make accurate, real-time decisions based on your current policy and the latest legal mandates.
• Workflow Automation: Our technology aligns with your mandated timelines, enabling you to initiate and review background checks on your schedule. This enhanced workflow helps you maintain compliance in high-liability states such as Washington and California. 
• Streamlined Adverse Action: Our platform simplifies the complex, multi-step Adverse Action sequence through seamless integration. By providing workflow visibility, we enable your team to efficiently manage the required review windows and documentation across all jurisdictions.

Don't let new hiring and background screening legislation expose your business to unnecessary risk. Turn complexity into a competitive advantage by ensuring your background screening process is fast, defensible, and fully compliant for 2026.

Ready to future-proof your hiring process? Schedule a brief consultation with a screening expert to see how Verified First can automate and simplify your multi-state screening program.

Book A Meeting